A king grew tired of listening to learned men argue. They had been at it for months, each certain, each contradicting the others, all of them quoting sources and none of them moving.
So he sent for an elephant, and he sent for a number of men who had been blind since birth, and he had the elephant brought into the courtyard where everyone could watch.
He led the men to the animal one at a time and placed each of them at a different part of it. Then he asked them, one by one, what an elephant is.
The man who had been given the side said an elephant is a wall. Broad, warm, and unbroken, and it goes on further than a man can reach.
The man who had been given the tusk said no. An elephant is smooth and hard and comes to a point, like a spear, and anyone who calls it a wall has not touched it.
The man at the trunk said they were both wrong and that an elephant is a thick snake, and that it moves, which walls do not.
The man at the ear said it is a broad soft thing that stirs the air, like a fan. The man at the leg said it is a pillar, like the trunk of a tree, rooted and still. The man at the tail said all of them were fools and that an elephant is a length of rope with a tuft on the end.
Every one of them had reported honestly. Not one of them had made anything up. That is exactly why the argument could not end.
Then they began to fight. Not politely. They called each other liars, because from inside each man's own evidence that is what the others were, and they were still shouting when the king went back inside.
He had not brought them there to learn about elephants.
The Lesson of the Blind Men and the Elephant
Honest reporting is not the same as a complete picture. Nobody in the courtyard lied. Each account was accurate about the part it covered and useless as a description of the animal. Being truthful protects you from one kind of error and not from this one.
The intensity of your certainty comes from your evidence being consistent. The man holding the tail had touched nothing that contradicted rope. His confidence was not arrogance, it was a small sample behaving well, which is what a small sample almost always does.
Ask what the other person is standing next to. The fastest way out of a stuck disagreement is usually not more argument about who is right. It is finding out which part of the animal they have their hands on, and whether it is a part you have never touched.
Where this actually comes from
The oldest surviving version is Buddhist. It appears in the Udana, part of the Pali canon, where the Buddha tells it about a king of Savatthi who is tired of ascetics quarrelling over metaphysics. Versions also travelled through Jain and Hindu texts, and later through Sufi literature, which is why it now feels like a story that belongs to everyone and to no particular place.
Most English readers met it through a poem by the American writer John Godfrey Saxe, published in the 1870s, which is where the six neat rhyming comparisons come from and where the line about each being partly right and all being wrong originates.
There is one thing worth correcting, because the story is now used to argue almost the opposite of its point. It is regularly quoted to mean that all views are equally valid and no one can claim to see the whole. In the original, someone can. The king is standing right there, and he can see the entire elephant, and the men arguing are not enlightened pluralists but people who have mistaken a fragment for the thing.
The story is not saying the truth is unavailable. It is saying you are probably holding one part of it and shouting.
The rest is for seekers
Keep reading free. Log in and every article on Reality Awake opens for you.
